|
|
Belkin, N. J., & Croft, W. B. (1992). Information Filtering and Information Retrieval: Two Sides of the Same Coin? Information Filtering and Information Retrieval, 35(12), 29–38.
|
|
|
|
Bell, B. (1992). Using Programming Walkthroughs to Design a Visual Language. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado at Boulder.
|
|
|
|
Berlin, L., & Jeffries, R. (1992). Consultants and Apprentices: Observations about Learning and Collaborative Problem Solving. In J. Turner, & R. Kraut (Eds.), Proceedings of ACM CSCW'92 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 130–137). New York: Acm.
|
|
|
|
Boland, R. J. J., Maheshwari, A. K., Te'eni, D., Schwartz, D. G., & Tenkasi, R. V. (1992). Sharing Perspectives in Distributed Decision Making. In J. Turner, & R. Kraut (Eds.), Proceedings of ACM CSCW'92 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 306–313). New York: Acm.
|
|
|
|
Bos, E. (1992). Some Virtues and Limitations of Action Inferring Interfaces. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Monterey, CA) (pp. 79–88). New York: ACM Press.
Abstract: The system called Eduard inferes actions by watching for repetitive patterns. Some of the core actions under observations include: copy, delete, redirect, move, open close, format, create, and rename. The result of an observation is a loop making use of these actions. The premis of Eduard is that USERS will re-execute the recorded (and maybe generalized) behavior themselves. Therefore, the system does not need to accquire any justifications for the recorded actions since it is up to the the user to make decisions about the applicability of behavior to specific situations. Consequently, Eduard ignores information requests by the user because they would “mess up pattern construction.” Eduard features a pseudo “natual language” interface for input and output. Generalization seems to be limited to type inference and quantier relaxation (this instance -> all instances
|
|
