Nakakoji, K. (1997). Beyond “Back-talk:” Uncovering Design Intention Through Critiquing. In L. Candy, & K. Hori (Eds.), Proceedings of an International Workshop on Strategic Knowledge and Concept Formation (pp. 99–110). Loughborough, UK: Loughborough University.
Abstract: Computational critiquing mechanisms have been used to support designers in refining a partial design solution during the course of reflection-in-action. The paper argues that by being embedded in an integrated design environment, critiquing mechanisms can help designers refine not only a partial solution but also a partially articulated design problem, uncovering design intentions. This claim is supported with the presentation of transcripts from user studies with the KID (Knowing-in-Design) design environment for kitchen floor plan design. Results of the study indicate that the embedded critics in KID helped designers explicitly articulate previously tacit domain knowledge in response to critiquing (13 Refs.)
|
|
Nakakoji, K., Suzuki, K., Okura, N., & Aoki, A. (1997). A Framework to Support Creativity in Multimedia Information Design. In Proceedings of INTERACT'97, Sydney, Australia (pp. 212–219).
|
|
Edwards, W. K., & Mynatt, E. D. (1997). Timewarp: Techniques for Autonomous Collaboration. In S. Pemberton (Ed.), Proceedings of ACM CHI 97 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 218–225). PAPERS: Collaborative Communities II, 1. New York: Acm.
|
|
Horvitz, E. (1997). Agents With Beliefs: Reflections on Bayesian Methods for User Modeling (Invited Talk Summary). In A. Jameson, C. Ã. ©cile Paris, & C. Tasso (Eds.), User Modeling: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference, UM97 (pp. 441–442). Vienna, New York: Springer.
|
Miller, J., Maes, P., & Shneiderman, B. (1997). Intelligent Software Agents vs. User-Controlled Direct Manipulation: A Debate. In S. Pemberton (Ed.), Proceedings of ACM CHI 97 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 105–106). Panels, 2. Acm.
Abstract: Critical issues in human-computer interaction -- in particular, the advantages and disadvantages of intelligent agents and direct manipulation -- will be discussed, debated, and hotly contested. The intent of the participants is to strike an appropriate balance between a serious discussion of the issues and an entertaining debate.
|
